Elsevier

The Ocular Surface

Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 77-87
The Ocular Surface

Original Research
A Two-Week, Randomized, Double-masked Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Lubricin (150 μg/mL) Eye Drops Versus Sodium Hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% Eye Drops (Vismed®) in Patients with Moderate Dry Eye Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2016.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this clinical trial (NCT02507934) was to assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant human lubricin as compared to a 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (HA) eye drop in subjects with moderate dry eye disease (DED).

Methods

DEWS Grade 2-3 subjects were randomized to use lubricin (N=19, 51.9 ± 11.8 years) or HA (N=20, 61.8 ± 13.3 years). After a saline washout period, subjects administered BID therapy for 7 days, followed by instillation as needed (2–6 drops per eye) for 7 days. Visual analog scale (VAS) including foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia were primary outcomes, with secondary endpoints of corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer test, tear film breakup time (TFBUT), eyelid and conjunctival erythema and number of instillations compared at day 14.

Results

The primary endpoint was met. Lubricin supplementation achieved greater than a 72% reduction from baseline in foreign body sensation (P<.013), burning/stinging, pain, sticky feeling (P<.0432), blurred vision (P<.0013), and photophobia (P<.011) in at least one eye. Lubricin also showed significant improvement in fluorescein staining (OD/OS: 43.8%/50.0%, vs. 26.5%/23.3%, P<.0398, P<.0232), TFBUT (P<.010), SANDE frequency (P<.0435), eyelid erythema (P<.004), conjunctival erythema (P<.0013), and instillations (P<.04) as compared to HA. No treatment-related adverse events occurred during the investigation.

Conclusions

Recombinant human lubricin was shown to produce significant improvement in both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease as compared to HA.

Introduction

Lubricin (PRG4: GenBank NP_005798), a large glycoprotein with a central mucin-like domain, was recently identified as a boundary lubricant that is transcribed, translated, and expressed by human ocular surface tissues.1 Lubricin dramatically reduces friction between the human cornea and conjunctiva.1 At a latex-glass interface, bulk human tear film mucins were incapable of lowering the coefficient of friction whereas lubricin was able to significantly ameliorate friction as compared to a saline control.2 In addition, lubricin significantly reduced both static and kinetic friction coefficients atop a human donor cornea-lid interface as compared to commercially available hyaluronic acid or saline solutions.1 Similar reductions in friction were seen at a human donor cornea-PDMS contact lens model interface following lubricin irrigation,3 as well as with commercial silicone hydrogel contact lenses atop human cornea and eyelid interfaces.4

Impaired lubricin biosynthesis, which occurs during inflammation,5, 6 is hypothesized to occur during various types of dry eye disease, and is associated with damage to the ocular surface.1 Pro-inflammatory cytokines common to dry eye, such as IL-1ɑ, IL-1ß, and TNFɑ,7, 8, 9 markedly reduce lubricin expression in other tissues such as articular cartilage.5, 6, 10 An inverse relationship has also been observed between the levels of procathepsin B, neutrophil elastase, and lubricin in the injured knee.11 Preliminary data suggest that cathepsin S, a key proteolytic enzyme released from the lacrimal gland in Sjögren syndrome,12 degrades lubricin and compromises its function,13 while loss of lubricin at the ocular surface resulted in significantly greater staining for PRG4 knockout mice than in wild-type controls.1 Accordingly, lubricin is thought to be a critical component of a healthy ocular surface glycocalyx, serving as an essential barrier to the development of corneal and conjunctival epitheliopathies.

As Ehlers previously speculated, the friction between cornea and the lid, particularly towards the lid margin, is likely dominated by boundary lubrication, mediated by a film of surface-active substances atop the corneal epithelium.14 If true, the replenishment of a competent glycocalyx should reduce ocular surface friction and improve signs and symptoms associated with dry eye disease (DED). To test this hypothesis, we sought to determine whether the topical administration of recombinant human lubricin would provide a superior reduction in ocular signs and symptoms as compared to a commercially available 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (HA) eye drop.

Section snippets

Methods: Study Design

This was a 2-week, randomized, double-masked, parallel group and 1-week follow-up study to evaluate tolerability, safety, and efficacy of lubricin eye drops as compared to HA. The trial began on June 26, 2015 and ended on October 6, 2015. (Trial period comprises first visit of first enrolled patient to last visit of last enrolled patients.) Prior to initiation, the Investigator's brochure and all other relevant documentation were reviewed and approved independently by ethics committees of

Results

Forty (40) subjects were screened and included in the investigation. A summary of demographics and disposition is shown in Table 1. All 40 enrolled patients were suffering from dry eye at a DEWS severity level 2 or 3 in at least one eye. The second most frequent underlying condition was Sjögren syndrome (37.5%) followed by hypertension (27.5%) and by autoimmune thyroiditis (20.0%). Other conditions had frequencies ≤17.5%. All randomized subjects were evaluated for safety variables. One subject,

Discussion

Our clinical investigation was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant human lubricin as compared to an HA eye drop solution in subjects with moderate dry eye disease. Recombinant human lubricin improved the sensation of blurred vision and the total score of ocular symptoms in the left eye, and foreign body sensation, photophobia, and sticky feeling in both eyes significantly more than HA, thus satisfying the primary hypothesis of the clinical investigation. Of note, all

Conclusions

Recombinant human lubricin 150 μg/mL was found to be safe, well tolerated, and generally superior to 0.18% sodium hyaluronate, improving both signs and symptoms in moderate DED subjects. Statistically significant treatment effects and numerous trends towards improvement suggest further studies aimed at elucidating the therapeutic effect of recombinant human lubricin in a larger patient cohort, as well as in more mild-to-severe cohorts, are warranted.

References (32)

  • S. Morrison et al.

    Dose-dependent and synergistic effects of proteoglycan 4 on boundary lubrication at a human cornea-polydimethylsiloxane biointerface

    Eye Contact Lens

    (2012)
  • A.R. Jones et al.

    Bioregulation of lubricin expression by growth factors and cytokines

    Eur Cell Mater

    (2007)
  • B. Li et al.

    Tear proteomic analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes and dry eye syndrome by two-dimensional nano-liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2014)
  • J. Li et al.

    Blueberry component pterostilbene protects corneal epithelial cells from inflammation via anti-oxidative pathway

    Sci Rep

    (2016)
  • L. Niu et al.

    Upregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome in the tears and ocular surface of dry eye patients

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • K.A. Elsaid et al.

    Decreased lubricin concentrations and markers of joint inflammation in the synovial fluid of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2008)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Current trends in pharmaceutical treatment of dry eye disease: A review

      2022, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Sources of Support: This study was supported by Dompé farmaceutici s.p.a., Italy, and Lμbris BioPharma, Boston MA and conducted by the contract research organization CROSS Sa - Switzerland. The sponsors had no role in the data collection or statistical analysis, but designed the study and prepared the manuscript. The final decision on content was retained by the authors.

    The authors wish to acknowledge the following financial interests: Dompé: Employee (FM). Lμbris BioPharma: Equity (ERT, GDJ, TAS, BDS, DAS), Patents (ERT, GDJ, TAS, BDS, DAS), Consultant (TAS), Director (ERT, BDS). TearLab Corporation: Equity (BDS), Patents (BDS), Employee (BDS).

    Single-copy reprint requests to Flavio Mantelli, MD, PhD or Benjamin D. Sullivan, PhD (addresses below).

    These authors equally contributed to the work and appear in alphabetical order.

    View full text